Comments on: Sunday Funnies: There’s a new contract for Scientology staff workers, and we have a copy

By: Toni m

Toni m — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 21:18:00 +0000

In reply to Bob. Sorry I did not ignore you. I went to sleep. And I just woke up. I'll look into it.

By: Bob

Bob — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:34:00 +0000

In reply to Toni m. Cool. The Australian history is quite interesting.

By: Bruce Decimus Meridius Martin

Bruce Decimus Meridius Martin — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:14:00 +0000

What “church” has people who want to join sign ANY contract??? Businesses do this, not religions. And “Church is not required to pay minimum wage or overtime to me. I further understand that the Church does not provide a pension or other such benefits.” Not required to pay minimum wage???? I guess that is a “win” for the Church of Miscavige? And signing a “non-disparagement agreement”? That is something businesses do, not religions. Great will be the day the Church of Miscavige comes tumbling down.

By: Toni m

Toni m — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 16:02:00 +0000

In reply to Bob.

Ok. Noted. Have a good day.
OHHHHHH I didn’t know the history of the Aussies. Now I get it. I’m slow in thinking.

By: Bob

Bob — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:50:00 +0000

In reply to Toni m. My dry sense if humor on the Aussies. Mostly this group of clams seem to ignore copyright laws. Not all Aussies.

By: edge

edge — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:14:00 +0000

This type of legal document does happen in the corporate world where departing CEOs and other high-ranking officials agree not to disparage the company. It also occurs in celebrity divorces; if I recall correctly Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes have it in their divorce that they don’t slag one another in public. The difference in these instances is that these agreements have reciprocity, and are written and reviewed by teams of lawyers as well as the signatories. This Sci agreement is completely one-sided, and I’m certain they’re not allowing staff time to review it with someone else. Hell, it’s probably frowned upon if someone requests time to read it. “What, you don’t trust us?”

By: Bob

Bob — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 03:40:00 +0000

In reply to Great White Clam. Lol

By: Great White Clam

Great White Clam — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 01:44:00 +0000

In reply to Bob. Itsa: illusion

By: InterestedObserver12

InterestedObserver12 — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:49:00 +0000

I thought the cult could never surprise me again. Was I wrong. This is so f***ing suppressive, so ridiculous, so desperate.

By: Scream Nevermore

Scream Nevermore — Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:30:00 +0000

Jeez, and I was nervous signing the Official Secrects Act – that’s worse!

And yes, Fearless Bleeder, come to Glasgow – we’re waiting on you, ya wee numpty!