lols…

Xenith Pride Facemask

“Are you suggesting that one go to links and then not read them? Or that *I* made such a suggestion?” YOU DIDN’T EVEN SUGGEST A LINK TO GO TO IN THE FIRST PLACE. All you did was say that there are tens of thousands of links out there, as a substitute even for naming a single one of them that supposedly might say something somewhere substantiating your claim.

“YOU SPECIFICALLY ASKED ME FOR THAT SITE” No, I asked you for some substantiation of your claims that he was highly regarded in his field. All you showed me is that he has a high opinion of himself.

“If the State of Virginia is refusing to publish the PM report, just where is it I’m expected, according to you, to show you those?” Where is your source saying that the state is suppressing the postmortem reports??? I didn’t even know that was what you are claiming. Where are you getting this claim? Based on what?

” Everyone? You’ve checked in with EVERYONE” I am talking about everyone who spoke with you on this thread. You can look up and down this thread for yourself. No-one, that is a total of zero people, finds what you claim to find.

” If what you’re talking about is the profession of psychiatry, where did I so slander anyone or anything?” You are accusing them of causing mass murders. That is a very grave accusation, and a very slanderous one.

My turn?

“What constitutes evidence is the document and arguments found at such website.” Well, of course, you idiot. Are you suggesting that one go to links and then not read them? Or that *I* made such a suggestion? Nah, you’re just nitpicking senselessly.

“About the brain-wave-trainer guy, for example, you would look at no discussion of it except his own, self-promoting site.” YOU SPECIFICALLY ASKED ME FOR THAT SITE. “Self promoting”? It’s his BUSINESS SITE. Of course it’s self promoting. What else would it be? And neither you nor anyone else asked me to look at anything else nor discuss it any further.

“Show me the actual PM reports, then. THAT would be evidence. You have not even shown any website discussing such postmortems.” ?????????? Other than in attack mode, where the hell is your head? If the State of Virginia is refusing to publish the PM report, just where is it I’m expected, according to you, to show you those? I was pointing out that the one Chicago newspaper report that “no drugs had been found in his body” was based on no evidence since the PM report had not been issued. And you stupidly want to make something else of it.

“Everyone else here who has looked into the matter has done their homework and found your claim totally false, and devised maliciously to slander a whole profession of good people.” A. Everyone? You’ve checked in with EVERYONE. Prove it. B. Totally false? Prove it. C. “…and devised maliciously to slander a whole profession of good people.” Prove it. THAT is slander. If what you’re talking about is the profession of psychiatry, where did I so slander anyone or anything? D. Malicious? The only malicious thing I’ve seen in all of this is your constant badgering of me at every opportunity. I’ve mentioned before that you appear to have some axe to grind where I’m concerned. It’s more than true. And you’re “willing to continue to speak to me”??? Seems as if you’ve leapt at every opportunity. Shutting your mouth seems an impossibility where I’m concerned, so please cease to squall about your “patience”.

“what you fail to realize is that accepting a posted URL to prove anything on the internet is utter BS” No, that’s what YOU fail to realize. What constitutes evidence is the document and arguments found at such website.

“When any story has over a 100,000 hits for instance, cherry picking one of them to fit whatever preconceived notion one has already established simply proves one’s credulity” You are projecting again: this is precisely what you do. About the brain-wave-trainer guy, for example, you would look at no discussion of it except his own, self-promoting site.

” I read those, then did further research and found that the source of the claim, the State of Virginia, was apparently covering up the situation and refusing to publish the actual PM reports” Show me the actual PM reports, then. THAT would be evidence. You have not even shown any website discussing such postmortems.

“one must be cautious….AND DO THEIR OWN HOMEWORK” Everyone else here who has looked into the matter has done their homework and found your claim totally false, and devised maliciously to slander a whole profession of good people. When you make a claim, it is YOUR homework to show substantiation for the claim if it is disputed.

” I’m wondering just who made you the Grand Poobah of what is right and correct on this blog?” I am one other human, but like most humans I have some capacity for critical thinking, and find a case like yours inexpressibly sad. The only thing that makes me unique is my patience in continuing to be willing to speak to you.

And what you fail to realize is that accepting a posted URL to prove anything on the internet is utter BS. When any story has over a 100,000 hits for instance, cherry picking one of them to fit whatever preconceived notion one has already established simply proves one’s credulity, something to which you seem to aspire. I refuse to believe that everyone on this blog simply buys into the latest “belief of the day” by accepting a single point of view stated, often by some unknown writer/reporter, as “the truth”.

Point in question were a couple of links posted here claiming that one of the shooters “had no psych drugs in his system”. They were links to newspaper reports…and we all know how reliable newspaper reports are. I read those, then did further research and found that the source of the claim, the State of Virginia, was apparently covering up the situation and refusing to publish the actual PM reports. (There were other links also pointing to a coverup.) Where information is concerned, Google is often a ten way street and one must be cautious….AND DO THEIR OWN HOMEWORK.

So I prefer to point to a variety of sources on such loaded subjects and let my blogmates here come to their own conclusions rather than trying to force my own choices onto them, a view to which you seem to ascribe.

LOL, btw, was my quite appropriate laughter at your inane and inconclusive comments. This latest cheap shot at using my earlier adherence to scio as your “proof” of your assertions merely shows your own inability to think clearly for yourself.

And after all the lambastings you have sent my way, I’m wondering just who made you the Grand Poobah of what is right and correct on this blog? Ah, well, perhaps it’s a STATUS thing.

What you posted repeatedly was nothing except the existence of Google. You seem to have no concept of what information is. There is nothing “unstated” about what my problem is with you: namely that you have no “bullshit detector”, will fall for any kind of crap, and propagate it. This lack of critical thought (like you inappropriate use of “LOL”) is a sad residue of Scientology.

Am I wrong here or wasn’t Lucifer one of the angels to begin with, then fell? That would mean that he had originally been a “light bringer” but the name was kept after he had fallen?

Yes, and I had posted it repeatedly, Robert. I note, too, that there are many, many assertions made on the blog which have no proof to them, yet you remain quiet about same. You seem to have some unstated axe to grind with me. LOL

And your source(s) for such an allegation?

never heard of this but I hearsayed it – sounds like a sweet little ol’ book…
on the development of boys.

Are you English Shirley?