Hi Monkey, how are ya?
My friend due about the same time as you had a little girl yesterday.
First baby, healthy and happy. She had the baby at home with a great midwife.
The new granddad had tears and sparkles in his voice…is that possible?
So, I am always remembering you when new baby stuff is happening.
Happy Sunday! Wishing you to be well :).

Yes…it is more than ironic that Scientology vilifies psychiatry for poor handling of truly desperate mentally ill people, but will not handle them itself as an organizational policy.

That would be like the local fire department refusing to put out a fire while at the same time blaming the victims of house fires for poor safety practices.

The fact is Scientology cannot handle mental illness. If it could it would. After all, Scientology is one of the most money motivated organizations in the world,yet they vilify psychiatry for being money motivated.

Beautiful – and accurate – description. She got the best out of her staff without having to berate or demean them. The world is a lesser place for her absence.

A SHAVE ? HOLY SHIT.

And I don’t feel so much like a miracle than a poster child for double birth control. :)))

But I am SO excited for them to be here. So is Ashy (finally))

I just don’t want to poop on anyone.

🙂

I thought “the whole of insanity” was caused by psychiatry. How can Scientology deny “treatment of a mental nature” when it proclaims itself to be the alternative to mental treatment? I suspect that on “the Biggest Loser,” access to the Deep Fried Pleasure Dome and a Ben & Jerry’s Golden Spoon (free everything forever?) are never denied to the participants, regardless of their degree of success any particular week. I suspect, rather, that there is no Deep Fried Pleasure Dome. Can you imagine: “No bucket of KFC for you, and no Chocolate Therapy, till you lose 5 pounds”???

How does Scientology account for PTS behavior in people who are not now and who have never been “suppressed? If neither they nor anyone around them has ever heard of Scientology and therefore neither approves, disapproves nor really even cares?

I think CoS could at least expand their definition of PTS a smidge to include non-Scientology-related “types.” Or is the idea that if a person is exhibiting behavior commonly considered to be potentially indicative of one form or another of “mental illness,” then he (… or she) is simply unaware of having been a Scientologist way back on the track, at which time they were suppressed like crazy?

Please stop deleting your posts, if you got something to say, stand by your words and don’t be scared. Ray your like a sleeping tablet.

I have nothing to and to what you wrote, it was thorough and a summary I can, for the most part, buy into. I wish I could write like that. You have obviously earned those skills with years of practice in whatever you have done with your life so far.

You are quite welcome, Ray Guest. I look forward to any response you have the time or inclination to offer. Happy holidays!