Comments on: Scientology True Crime: A First Look at Nancy Many’s Docudrama Airing January 16

By: ᅠᅠᅠ

ᅠᅠᅠ — Sat, 15 Jul 2017 11:29:00 +0000

In reply to Victor Delano. Good idea, replace following one cult with following another…

By: Victor Delano

Victor Delano — Sat, 14 Jan 2017 06:35:00 +0000

These people all have one thing in common: God is missing from their lives.
As a result their gullibility and naivete’ are monumental! Sad.

By: J. Paul Zoccali

J. Paul Zoccali — Wed, 04 Feb 2015 02:14:00 +0000

I recently learned that I have been the subject of covert brainwashing connected to Scientology. I’m currently reading Lawrence Wright’s “Going Clear.” It contains a great deal of information that supports my claims.

By: Brandon Roberts

Brandon Roberts — Mon, 24 Mar 2014 05:02:00 +0000

In reply to i-Betty. good that you got out

By: Brandon Roberts

Brandon Roberts — Mon, 24 Mar 2014 04:59:00 +0000

this is a good story and exposes scientology for what it really is a moneymaking cult dreamed up by a con man i think more people should mock it because it deserves to be mocked and yes i’m aware i’ll get muredered for this but i don’t care

By: Emma Duncan

Emma Duncan — Sat, 02 Mar 2013 21:13:00 +0000

I have hope that Scientology is going down, because thanks to the internet, and, yes, South Park, that more people are seeing this for the dangerous cult it is, I am concerned that because of the sheer stupidity of the whole Xenu story, that maybe people aren’t taking them as seriously as they should be.

By: Need to know

Need to know — Sat, 19 Jan 2013 02:11:00 +0000

Not sure if you will see this but The broadcast of Nancy Many’s docudrama will be rerun on Sat at 3pm and on id 285 1/19. Get the word out if you can. There was so little warning of this being aired that many missed it. This is a must see!

By: Bob

Bob — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:44:00 +0000

In reply to CJC. No not Hubbard. He gave credit to all the people he drew from. He clearly stated he was just putting it in a new form. But he got the knowledge from others. Now the acknowledgements are removed from the books. So it looks like it all came from him. Micksavage wants to create the idea that there is nothing else worth reading and that is just not true. Reading the sources Hubbard used is very enlightening.

By: CJC

CJC — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:26:00 +0000

In reply to Kim O’Brien.

No Kim, that’s not what Bob is saying at all. Here’s what he said, “… the most common reason that people are there is it helps them in some way. That is not all fake as I have seen numerous people that genuinely got some particular thing they wanted corrected.” And as I posted above, there are definite benefits to be had. That how it progresses. Why would people stay in, if it was all heartache from the very beginning? Prove to people that they can get benefit from THIS course, they’ll want to take the next (more expensive) one, and so on and on.

By: CJC

CJC — Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:19:00 +0000

In reply to Bob.

27 years in, 16 years out – and I can tell you there are definite benefits to be had and useful things to learn – in the beginning. The only “problem” I have with that is that Hubbard claimed the work was his, when he actually plagiarized the work of others (something the average Scientologist won’t know until they decide to step out of the box a little and do their own research).