Comments on: A Scientology Knockoff That Considers Children ‘Sexy’? Great Xenu’s Ghost!

By: darkdragonlady

darkdragonlady — Mon, 14 Sep 2015 05:28:00 +0000

Truth: Access makes a big distinction between sexuality and what they call “sexualness” which is more the innate caring and deep feeling of the soul with spiritual and emotional connection to others, not the physical act of copulation and certainly not forcing it on another person of any age.

By: freeyourmind

freeyourmind — Fri, 11 Oct 2013 17:32:00 +0000

In reply to LemonLemon.

I’m all over these guys. Access Schism has the skinny.

http://www.accessschism.com

By: InTheNameOfXenu

InTheNameOfXenu — Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:37:30 +0000

In reply to Chuck Beatty. How many splinter groups came out of Scientology anyway? Is there a database on this somewhere?

By: LemonLemon

LemonLemon — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 20:14:07 +0000

The “sexy children” bit is concerning. People who try to justify saying that children are sexy and saying they aren’t hurting the children but are LOVING them, are pedophiles and will attract more pedophiles into their fold. It’s like Nambla. It’s an entire group of people who support and perpetuate pedophelia. They pat themselves on the back and act like the victims for being shamed in society. They justify it by saying, “We should be allowed to love who we want”. It’s befuddling to me that groups like this are allowed to continue.

Those AAC chicks sounded like they had just read “The Secret” and were at a book club to discuss it. “The Secret” says that you think of something you want…concentrate on it, putting it out to the universe and it will come to you”. Sound familiar?

By: Artoo45

Artoo45 — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:00:52 +0000

Okay peeps, the vacuuous blondes, the Elron ripoff, the Sooper-Kute™ Chiro. They’re all fun to bat around. But there’s some potential for enabling pedophiles in this dreck. Read the section in the following link down by the picture of the “sexy” child. This is a recipe for disaster. I’m not prude and am totally sex positive between consentin adults, but this shit is just creepy as hell http://access-consciousness-blog.com/2012/10/family/

By: deElizabethan

deElizabethan — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:55:13 +0000

In reply to Observer.

Observer, “though I do know there’s a whole lot that I don’t know.” — You are already wise!
“Should I start a cult?” — You have too much wisdom!

By: sitkajo

sitkajo — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:47:07 +0000

In reply to Skwerl King.

Try to Google RC, Jackins etc
There is apostate RC groups around the world. Also various articles c on the web are critical of RC as a cult. “Sex lies and co-counsling” is an often cited article.
Also if you look on operation clambake they have a set of FBI files on L. ron Hubbard in chronologically order. About 1958 or so L. Ron reported Jackins to the FBI as a communist. Thats when the split happened.

By: Artoo45

Artoo45 — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:45:33 +0000

In reply to Observer. Actually that's one of the "distinctions" one learns at Landmark Forum, another bit of squirreled "tech." The squirrels are everywhere!

By: thenextmrstomcruise

thenextmrstomcruise — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:25:08 +0000

In reply to sheepherder. No probs. I have a soft spot for sheep, and their herders :)

By: Sherbet

Sherbet — Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:52:08 +0000

In reply to WhereIsSHE. Thanks, WIS.